Legal Opinion

Tod v. Waldman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 17, 1924No. 95PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

We think that the complaint of the Government is well founded. The petitioners in the writ of habeas corpus were aliens who had not been legally admitted to the country — that is, neither the immigration authorities nor the court had held that they were entitled to admission. The immigration authorities had ordered their deportation. The Circuit Court of Appeals merely found that in the course of the examination by the immigration authorities the relators had not been given a fair opportunity to appeal to the Secretary of Labor as provided by the statute. This denial of appeal did not give to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Department of Homeland Security v. ThuraissigiamSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API