Legal Opinion

Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 2020No. 19-161PublishedCited by 1,157 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

*1963Every year, hundreds of thousands of aliens are apprehended at or near the border attempting to enter this country illegally. Many ask for asylum, claiming that they would be persecuted if returned to their home countries. Some of these claims are valid, and by granting asylum, the United States lives up to its ideals and its treaty obligations. Most asylum claims, however, ultimately fail, and some are fraudulent. In 1996, when Congress enacted the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), 110 Stat. 3009-546, it crafted a system for weeding out patently meritless…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,157 opinions

  1. Yajure HurtadoBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
  2. Hernandez Lara v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Q. LIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
  5. Syed Tazu v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

1,152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API