Williams v. King
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
The pro se plaintiff in this action has alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Two of the three defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the motion of those two defendants is granted.
FACTS
For the purposes of this motion, the facts as alleged in the complaint are assumed to be true. The plaintiff, Reverend Michael Williams, applied in April of 1978 to the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Edward Spannaus v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Massie v. IKON Office Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Varrone v. BilottiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Estate of Castucci Ex Rel. Castucci v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004