Hennessy v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered 'March 6, 1902, dismissing an action for want of equity upon the court’s own motion; and also from an order entered January 3, 1903, denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
Respondents move the court to dismiss this appeal. It is urged that the appeal was not taken in time, and that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. The reasons advanced in support of this phase of the motion were discussed in State ex rel. Hennessy v. Huston, 32 Wash. 154, 72 Pac. 1015. In that case a writ of mandate was sought to require the trial court to settle .and certify the statement of facts proposed in the case now before us. *426It was there contended that the time for appeal in this case began to run from the date of the original judgment of dismissal. But it appeared…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Hennessy v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- School District No. 3 v. Western Tube Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Hennessy v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Wheatcroft v. GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- General Electric Co. v. Sapulpa & I. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.