Legal Opinion
Ex parte Haralampopoulos
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 26, 1923No. Nos. 2328-2330PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
These three aliens, in a second attempt to enter this country, arrived at Providence, R. I., October 1, 1922. After a hearing before the board of special inquiry at Boston, Mass., they were excluded as “coming in excess of the quota allowed nationals of the country of their birth, namely, Island of Rhodes (Other Asia), in accordance with the Act of May 19, 1921, as amended by the Act of May 11, 1922.” On appeal, after hearing before the board of review, the excluding decision of the board of special inquiry was affirmed by the Commissioner General of Immigration. It…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gegiow v. UhlSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gonzales v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ex parte GregoryDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hughes v. United States ex rel. BranzettiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- United States ex rel. Lacas v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924