Legal Opinion

Grand Lodge Colored Knights of Pythias of Texas v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1934No. 4240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

Amelia Rhodes instituted this suit as beneficiary under a certificate which had been issued insuring the life of her husband, Thomas J. Rhodes, which named her as beneficiary. She also sued as next friend of their daughter, Clarice Rhodes, a minor, praying that, in the event the court should decree she was not entitléd to recover, she recover for her said daughter. The certificate of insurance was in the sum of $500, and in addition she prayed that she have judgment • for the statutory penalty of 12 per cent, and reasonable' attorney’s fees in the sum of $200.

The defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Casualty Co. v. MorganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Karotkin Furniture Co. v. DeckerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Bustamante v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Holsomback v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. McMath Co. v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Railroad Commission v. Royal Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Watson v. WhittonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API