Legal Opinion

Blatt v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 30, 2002No. 301CV7575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, District Judge.

This is an insurance coverage case in which the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motions shall be denied, and plaintiffs’ motion shall be granted.

Plaintiffs Tanya Blatt and Brad Blatt are husband and wife. Tanya was injured seriously while riding as a passenger in a car driven by one Lawrence Morgan. Morgan drove into an intersection without stopping, colliding with another vehicle. Tanya has recovered against the tortfea-sor, but remains uncompensated for the full extent of her injuries.

Plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Martin v. Midwestern Group InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gyori v. Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Linko v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ezawa v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC v. SlaughterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API