Hammick v. Jacobs
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MARIT HAMMICK, Case No. 3:19-cv-00200-JR Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. MATTHEW SCOTT JACOBS and FRANKLIN UNITED INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendants. _______________________________ RUSSO, Magistrate Judge: Defendants Matthew Scott Jacobs and Franklin United, Inc. (“Franklin”) move for summary judgment on plaintiff Marit Hammick’s claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff also moves for summary judgment in regard to her negligence per se claim. All parties have consented to allow a Magistrate Judge enter final orders…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.