Legal Opinion

Burke v. Yingling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1995No. 02422PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this case, we are asked to decide whether a transaction involving the purchase of a custom audio/video system by appellant, Bryan L. Yingling, M.D. (“Buyer”), from appellee, Joseph Burke, t/a, d/b/a, Audio Video Concepts (“Seller”), falls within section 201-7 of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 73, § 201-7 (1993) (the “UTPCPL”).

Section 201-7 provides, in pertinent part:(a) Where goods or services having a sale price of twenty-five dollars ($25) or more are sold or contracted to be sold to a buyer, as a result of, or in connection with, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Pirozzi v. Penske Olds-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Briggs v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Johnson v. Metlife Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Wilson v. ParisiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Romeo v. Pittsburgh AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Fowler v. Rauso (In Re Fowler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API