Legal Opinion
State v. Fischer
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 2007No. 20060153PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Paul A. Fischer appealed from a district court order denying his motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal and quashing his notice of appeal filed on May 2, 2006. We conclude the district court abused its discretion when it denied Fischer’s motion for an extension of time, and we reverse.
I
[¶ 2] On November 30, 2004, the State charged Fischer with three drug-related felonies and criminal trespassing. After his arrest on these charges, Fischer applied for and received a court-appointed attorney. Several days later, Fischer requested the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- State v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- MIDWEST EMPLOYERS CASUALTY CO., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. Jo Ann WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Liebelt v. SabyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Mattison v. B.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Abdulrazzak v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons and ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.