Legal Opinion

State v. Metz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1999No. 91-1287; CA A98686PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for two counts of aggravated murder. ORS 163.095. In the first penalty-phase jury proceeding, defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. In State v. Metz, 131 Or App 706, 887 P2d 795 (1994), rev den 323 Or 483 (1996), we remanded for a new penalty-phase proceeding, which again resulted in a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. On appeal, defendant seeks vacation of his sentence and remand for a new penalty-phase jury proceeding. For the reasons set forth below, we remand for resentencing.

Becaus…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Memphis Publishing Co. v. Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TerryOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Terrick Terrell Nooner v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API