Alonzo v. State ex rel. Booth

BLOODWORTPI, Justice.

This case was originally assigned to the author of the dissenting opinion. The facts and assignments of error are stated quite thoroughly and in detail in that opinion. It is unnecessary to repeat them here. We 'agree with each conclusion reached in'the dissenting opinion respecting each assign*610ment of error except that which holds the trial court erred to reversal in denying defendant’s request to have the tapes examined electronically by an electronics expert to determine whether they had been altered or changed.

The testimony of State’s witness, Stokes, who made the…