Legal Opinion

Skutt v. Kent Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1904No. Calendar No. 20,445PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus by Henry Skutt to compel Alfred Wolcott, circuit judge of Kent county, to vacate an order setting aside an order allowing an amendment to a plea.

1Per curiam

Relator was defendant in a suit reversed by this court because a settlement made with the plain*478tiff was not admissible under the plea of the general issue. See Sunlin v. Skutt, 133 Mich. 208 (94 N. W. 733). After the remittitur was filed in the circuit court, respondent granted a motion of defendant to amend his plea by adding notice of settlement. Later, respondent set aside the order granting said motion, on the ground that he had exceeded his power in granting it. The position of the respondent was that, the case having been appealed from the justice to the circuit court, the granting of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cattermole v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. St. Clair Tunnel Co. v. St. Clair Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sunlin v. SkuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Loranger v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Daly v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Cook v. Wolverine Stockyards Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hartz v. JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. City of Flint v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Geddis v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API