Legal Opinion
In re Kinnane Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 4, 1915No. 5387PublishedCited by 9 opinions
In Bankruptcy. Proceedings against the Kinnane Company. On application to confirm composition (217 Fed. 488).
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
When the first offer of composition of the Kinnane Company (hereinafter called the Company) was rejected on account of a defect in procedure (217 Fed. 488), the court expressed the opinion that, inasmuch as a majority of the creditors in number and as to the amount of indebtedness were apparently favorable to a composition, the privilegé of submitting a new offer should be accorded. The Company thereupon submitted to its creditors the following offer of composition;
“Now comes the respondent, the Kinnane Company, and offers the following terms of composition to its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Clarke v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New River Coal Land Co. v. Ruffner Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
- Ransom v. GeerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882
- In re Kinnane Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- In Re KornbluthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In re MirkusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Kinkead v. J. Bacon & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- In Re JeppsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.