Legal Opinion

New River Coal Land Co. v. Ruffner Bros.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1908No. 757PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Law, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston, in Bankruptcy,

1Per curiam

We have given careful consideration to the arguments submitted, and are of opinion that the order granting a stay of proceedings in the state court was clearly authorized by the bankruptcy act. In the administration of the affairs of insolvent persons and corporations the jurisdiction of the federal courts in bankruptcy is essentially exclusive. “The intent of the bankruptcy law,” says the Supreme Court in Re Watts & Sachs, 190 U. S. 27, 23 Sup. Ct. 718, 47 L. Ed. 933, “is to place the administration of affairs of insolvents exclusively under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts.” Bankr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Bryan v. BernheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. In re KnightDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. LenhartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
  2. In re Grafton Gas & Electric Light Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1918
  3. Chandos, Incorporated v. SamsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ohio Motor Car Co. v. Eiseman Magneto Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. In re Kinnane Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API