Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 7, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-2065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge

Dr. Jerome S. Paige is Plaintiffs’ expert on economic loss. Over a defense objection, the Court previously permitted him to submit amended reports, even though they constituted his third and fourth reports on the same topic. On July 8, 2015, after a discussion of this issue at a status hearing, the Court issued a Minute Order that, inter alia, precluded Paige from issuing any further reports beyond those four. Plaintiffs now ask the Court to revisit that ruling and to permit him to yet again supplement his reports. As…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keener v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1998
  2. Dag Enterprises Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Richardson v. KorsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Sd3, LLC v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Burns v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Perez v. Sunbeam Products, IncDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API