Legal Opinion

Mapp v. Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1969No. Appeal, 814PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an appeal from denial of benefits in 1960 by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The procedural context in which this case is now before us is complex, but it is sufficient to note that at the present time we are directed by the Supreme Court to consider the case on the merits. Mapp v. Philadelphia, 433 Pa. 517, 252 A. 2d 684 (1969).

The first issue to be determined is whether appellant suffered an accident under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

A brief recitation of the relevant evidence presented to the Board follows.

Appellant, Ruby Mapp, then twenty-four years old,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Kracoski v. Bernice White Ash Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Schrecengost v. O. K. Heilman Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Wilk v. the Budd CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Mapp v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nash v. Sandnes' Sons, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Rose v. HooverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Reed v. Glidden Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Mapp v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Berger v. BergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API