Legal Opinion

Mapp v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1974No. Appeal, No. 888 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This workmen’s compensation case has a history of more than 18 years. We approach this appeal with the sincere hope that our resolution of the matter will hasten rather than further prolong the inevitable, although so far elusive, termination of the case.

The factual background was succinctly set forth by Judge Hoffman, writing for the Superior Court in Mapp v. Philadelphia, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 101, 102-03, 257 A. 2d 306, 307 (1969) : “Appellant, Ruby Mapp, then twenty-four years old, joined the Philadelphia police force on April 25, 1955, having been certified as fit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Palmer v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Arnold Coal & Supply Co. v. MarkleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Kracoski v. Bernice White Ash Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Woodcraft & Foundry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. 4156 Bar Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Heintz Division Kelsey Hayes Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Penn Paper Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Warden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API