Legal Opinion
Reed v. Glidden Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1974No. Appeal, No. 16 Tr. Dkt. 1973PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
Samuel L. Beed (claimant) allegedly suffered an injury to his right hand during June of 1968, while in the employ of the Glidden Company (Glidden). He sought compensation pursuant to the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §1 et seq., and, following hearings, a referee awarded him compensation for the period from August 8, 1968 to May 12, 1969. On appeal, the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), without talcing additional testimony, reversed the findings of the referee on the basis that the claimant had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leipziger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Smith v. Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Uditsky v. KrakovitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Benci v. Vesta Coal CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. CzepurnyjCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Del VecchioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- McGraw-Edison/Power Systems Division v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Borough of Aliquippa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.