Legal Opinion
O'Donnell v. Vencor, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2006No. 05-15587PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
2Per curiam
ORDER
The panel of judges named above amends, in the following manner, the per curiam opinion filed October 10, 2006:
A
At slip opinion page 17370, delete the paragraph that begins at the top of the page with the words “O’Donnell originally timely filed her first complaint ...” and ends with the words “proceedings on O’Donnell’s EPA claims.” Replace that deleted paragraph with the following:
O’Donnell originally timely filed her first complaint asserting a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., (“Title VII”),…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BeggerlySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rita J. Minnette v. Time WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by72 opinions
- City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Dent v. Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Nora v. Residential Funding Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.