Legal Opinion
Nora v. Residential Funding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 26, 2013No. 13-1660PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Wendy Nora appeals the dismissal of her suit alleging fraud in the state-court foreclosure proceeding in which she lost her home. The district court dismissed her suit as barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Because the principles of Rook-er-Feldman deprived the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction, we affirm.
Nora secured a $135,900 mortgage loan on her home from Aegis Mortgage Corporation. The loan was later assigned to Residential Funding Company. When Nora stopped making loan payments, Residential Funding filed a foreclosure action in Wisconsin state court. Residential…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sigsworth v. City Of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Marietta Taylor v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Waterfield Mortgage Company, and Burke, Costanza & Cuppy, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Matter Of LisseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- PNC Bank v. Sheila SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Spencer v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Spencer v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (In re Spencer)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Andress v. Daubert Law Firm LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.