Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Paslick v. Shay

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 31, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller —

Affirming.

The appellees, Maude M. Shay, Arthur L., Onie V.- and Roy S. Brentlinger were the owners of a 25 foot lot on Goss avenue in Louisville, Ky., which was devised to them hy their father, George S. Brentlinger. Maude, is of age; Arthur and Onie are infants over 14 years of age, while Roy is under 14.

On December 5, 1904, the Jefferson County Court; entered the following order:

“Jefferson County Court.
“December 5, 1904.
“On motion of W. C. Caplinger, uncle of Arthur Brentlinger, Onie Brentlinger and Roy Brentlinger, *644orphans of Onie L. Brentlinger,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Hart's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. McNew's Executors v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Jacobs's adm'r v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  4. Brame v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  5. Singleton v. CogarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tandy & Fairleigh Tobacco Co. v. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Poynter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Salyer v. Consolidation Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API