State v. Strandness
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*518OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Respondent motorcyclist moved to suppress evidence of his intoxication and to dismiss charges of fourth-degree DWI, arguing that the officer who stopped him had no reasonable, articulable suspicion that respondent was involved in criminal activity because respondent’s right turn against a red traffic light and a sign prohibiting right turns on a red light was “appropriate and within the parameters of the law.” The district court granted respondent’s motion. Because we conclude that the affirmative defense that respondent relies on applies only after a motorcyclist has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.