Pierchoski v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Pierchoski)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Chief Judge.
Cross-motions for summary judgment by debtor and Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) are before us.
IRS contends that a prepetition tax debt owed to it by debtor falls within the scope of the exception to discharge set forth at 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(l)(B)(i) because debtor never filed required tax returns and that it therefore is entitled to summary judgment in its favor.
Debtor contends that the tax debt does not fall within the scope of the exceptions to discharge set forth at 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(l)(B)(i) or § 523(a)(l)(B)(ii) and that he therefore is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner v. Lane-Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Germantown Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hansen v. Commissioner of IrsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re William C. Hindenlang, Debtor. United States of America v. William C. HindenlangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Pierchoski v. United States, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Pierchoski)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- United States v. Pierchoski (In Re Pierchoski)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999