Legal Opinion

Pierchoski v. United States, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Pierchoski)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1999No. 19-10049PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs Motion For Partial Summary Judgment After Remand

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Chief Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We previously determined that the debt owed to Internal Revenue Service by debt- or John Pierchoski for unpaid federal income taxes for tax years 1983 through 1989 was dischargeable and on that basis entered summary judgment in favor of debtor and against Internal Revenue Service in the above adversary action.

The precedent upon which our decision was based was subsequently reversed, causing our reviewing court to vacate the order and remand to allow debtor an opportunity to demonstrate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Lane-Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Erwin R. WunderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Hindenlang v. United States (In Re Hindenlang)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. Pierchoski v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Pierchoski)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hetzler v. United States (In Re Hetzler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  2. United States v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  3. Brumbaugh v. United States (In Re Brumbaugh)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Shrenker v. United States (In Re Shrenker)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  5. Ehrig v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Ehrig)District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API