Legal Opinion
Finkelstein v. S. H. Kress & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 8, 1940No. 300PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This is an action at law brought by the owner of U. S. Patent No. 2,039,789 to recover damages for infringement. The patent was for a new and improved hair curling device and a new and improved method of curling the hair: The object of the patent is to provide a hair curling device and a method of curling the hair whereby a woman can form a series of curls in her hair and hold each curl in place by means of a bobby pin: In order to hold a curl by a bobby pin'it is necessary for one shank of the pin to be located inwardly of the curl and the, other shank to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Temco Electric Motor Co. v. Apco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Imhaeuser v. BuerkSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pettingill v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Radio Corporation of America v. EJ Edmond & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Technical Tape Corporation v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Sears, Roebuck and Company and the Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Foster Metal Products, Inc. v. Jacoby-Bender, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.