Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Day and Night Electric Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1985No. Civ. 23557PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

The California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (CTRPA) (Gov. Code, § 67000 ff.) seeks the removal of a warehouse addition of Day and Night Electric, Inc. (Day and Night) constructed in violation of its land use ordinance. Day and Night was informed by CTRPA that the ordinance prohibited additions to the Day and Night property. Day and Night proceeded to construct the warehouse on the basis of a building permit it obtained from the City of South Lake Tahoe after the city repudiated CTRPA’s authority and before CTRPA obtained an injunction quelling this governmental insurgency.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Mitchell v. County Sanitation District Number OneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Ass'n v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Hudson v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION ETC.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API