Legal Opinion

Henry v. Tyler

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 1, 2020No. 3:19-cv-02869Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JEAN E. HENRY, Case No. 19-cv-02869-CRB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH 10 v. PREJUDICE 11 BRIAN J. TYLER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Jean Henry’s third complaint in this derivative shareholder action once again alleges that 14 former and current McKesson Corp. executives and directors (collectively, “Defendants”) 15 breached their fiduciary duties. And once again, Henry fails to sufficiently allege either demand 16 futility or that McKesson participated in a price-fixing conspiracy. Because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API