Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Hallock

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1940No. Nos. 110—112, 183, and 399Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

309 U.S. 106 (1940)

HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

v.

HALLOCK ET AL., TRUSTEES.[*]

No. 110.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 13, 1939.

Decided January 29, 1940.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

Mr. Arnold Raum, with whom Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and Lee A. Jackson were on the brief, for petitioners in Nos. 110-112, 183, and respondent in No. 399.

Messrs. Walker H. Nye and Ashley M. Van Duzer, with whom Mr. W.B. Stewart was on the brief, for respondents in Nos. 110 and 111. Mr. W.H.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Frankfurter; Dissent.

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API