Legal Opinion

State v. Matz

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2006No. 05-345PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Steven Leo Matz (Matz) appeals from the verdict and judgment entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, finding him guilty of felony aggravated assault and enhancing his sentence for that offense with an additional five years pursuant to § 46-18-221, MCA, based upon the finding that he used a weapon in the commission of the offense. We affirm.

¶2 We consider the following issues on appeal:

¶3 (1) Did the District Court err in denying Matz’s proposed jury instruction which would have required the State to prove that Matz did not act with justifiable use of force?

¶4…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. GuillaumeMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kills on Top v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. WeldeleMontana Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Paul RaczMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. Coby McOmberMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. Kirk SpencerMontana Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API