State v. Paul Racz

¶1 Paul Laszlo Racz (Racz) appeals from his conviction in the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, of criminal possession of dangerous drugs. We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 Did law enforcement’s handling of evidence deprive Racz of his right to a fair trial?

¶4 Did the District Court’s failure to hold a hearing on the validity of Racz’s complaints concerning his attorney’s effectiveness constitute error?

¶5 Was Racz deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel?

¶6 Did the prosecutor’s closing argument constitute prosecutorial misconduct?

¶7 Does the…