Legal Opinion

State v. Coats

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

The defendant Coats is charged, in an information filed by the district attorney, with having maintained and conducted, for money, a nickel-in-the- slot machine in Polk county. From an order sustaining a general demurrer to the information, the State appeals.

The facts in the information setting forth the commission of the alleged crime are identical with those in the pinball machine case (State v. Coats) this day held to constitute a lottery. As stated in the companion case, a pinball machine and a nickel-in-the-slot machine come within the same category and must be judged by the same law.…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Harris v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. Peachey v. Boswell, MayorIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API