Legal Opinion

State v. Nastick

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2017No. 28243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHAFER, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Adam Nastick, appeals his convictions in Summit County Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons that follow, this Court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} On March 1, 2015, at approximately 6:58 p.m., Sergeant DeWitt of the Ohio State Highway Patrol observed Nastick operating a silver Nissan above the posted speed limit. Sergeant DeWitt followed the vehicle for a short time before activating the overhead lights on his cruiser and initiating a traffic stop. At the beginning of the stop, a dispatcher informed Sergeant DeWitt that Nastick had an active concealed carry permit.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Toledo v. WyseOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State v. SislerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API