Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Schierding

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1983No. 45381PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

The sole question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in its dismissal of plaintiff’s amended petition for damages on the ground the petition was barred by the 5-year statute of limitations, § 516.120, RSMo (1978). We affirm.

On May 18, 1976, plaintiff was injured while riding in an automobile operated by her husband, Herbert F. Daniels, while in the course of his employment by Monsanto Company. The original petition was filed on December 1, 1977, naming three defendants, Schierding, Lemans, and Daniels. Subsequent to the accident the plaintiff and her husband…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Laclede Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Emanuel v. RichardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Atkinson v. Be-Mac Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. McReynolds v. VawterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. Kennon v. Citizens Mutual Insurance-Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Stephens v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. U.S. Laminating Corp. v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of DelawareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Nitcher v. Newton County JailMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API