Emanuel v. Richards
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
Both the magistrate and circuit courts dismissed plaintiff’s petition for failure to commence his action within the five-year statute of limitations, and he appeals. The issue: Although filing suit and issuance of summons usually tolls a statute of limitation, did the plaintiff’s nine-month delay in having an alias summons served on the defendant amount to such a lack of diligent prosecution as to revive the statute of limitations? We say no.
Plaintiff’s cause of action accrued March 13, 1961, when the defendant rear-ended his car. Plaintiff filed his statement in the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Electric Company v. Ebco, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Driscoll v. KonzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Tice v. MilnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Fine v. Waldman Mercantile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Mayne v. Jacob Michel Real Estate Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by20 opinions
- Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Williams v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Meek Lumber Yard, Inc. v. Houts (In Re Houts)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
- Neal v. Laclede Gas CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hennis v. TuckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.