Legal Opinion
United States v. Feigenbaum
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 2004No. 02-30330PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Appellant Bradford P. Feigenbaum pleaded guilty to one count of attempted transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(a) and 2. In this appeal, Feigenbaum argues that he was sentenced under the wrong edition of the Sentencing Guidelines and that five of his conditions of supervised release involve a greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary. We review Feigenbaum’s challenges to his sentence and to conditions of supervised release 4, 5, 6, and 9 for plain error because he failed to raise these…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jane Doe, a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian and Mother, Alisa Rudy-Glanzer v. Elroy "Bud" Glazer, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Does v. CooperDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015