Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Abrams v. Lamone
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 26, 2007No. 142, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1ConcurrenceEldridge, J.
I agree with the result in this case on the ground that Mr. Perez has not been a member of the Maryland Bar for ten years. I disagree, however, with Chief Judge Bell’s opinion which is joined by two other members of the Court.
Article V, § 4, of the Constitution of Maryland sets forth the qualifications for a person to be eligible for the office of Attorney General of Maryland. Section 4 provides (emphasis added):
“Section 4. Qualifications of Attorney General.
No person shall be eligible to the office of Attorney General, who is not a citizen of this State, and a qualified voter therein, and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Abrams v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007