Legal Opinion
Hearing Components, Inc. v. Shure Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 1, 2010No. 2009-1364, 2009-1365PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Hearing Components, Inc. (“Hearing Components”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas determining that claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent 5,401,920 (the “'920 patent”) are invalid as being indefinite. Hearing Components, Inc. v. Shure, Inc., No. 9:07-CV-104, slip op. at 11-13, 2008 WL 6763141 (E.D.Tex. Dec. 1, 2008) (“Claim Construction Opinion ”). Hearing Components also appeals from the court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) of noninfringement of claims 17 and 36 of U.S. Patent 4,880,076 (the “'076…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Datamize, L.L.C. v. Plumtree Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Deere & Co. v. Bush Hog, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Laser Peripherals, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.