Legal Opinion

Taylor Coal Co. v. Board of Drainage Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 19, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court. -

1Opinion of the Court

jOpinion op the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

Appellant owns and operates a coal mine in the vicinity of Beaver Dam creek, a tributary of Muddy creek, which latter stream empties into Rough river. Between the month of the mine and Beaver Dam creek slack and other refuse taken from its mine have been piled upon appellant’s premises. In times of rainfall this slack washes from these piles into a ditch leading from the mine to a ditch constructed by the Illinois Central Railroad Company, or its predecessor, along its right of way; the latter ditch empties into Muddy creek. This situation has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Williams v. WeddingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. City of Richmond v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Hay v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. Johnston v. LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louisville Hydro-Electric Co. v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. WEST KENTUCKY COAL COMPANY v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API