Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 10, 1921No. 10729PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Before Wilson, J., Richland, October, 1920. Action by S. B. McMaster against Ford Motor Co. and others. Judgment for plaintiff and the Ford Motor Co. and Universal Auto Co. appeal. cite: Act which if'done by one would not be actionable, will not be made actionable if done by several by agreement: 24 How., 407; 37 E. R. A., 455; 58 E. R. A., 135; 91 N. Y. S., 185. E'ffect of malice or bad motive: 62 L. R. A., 673; A. C. (1898), 1; A. C. (1892), 25; Cooley, Torts (2d.

Read the full summary

Before Wilson, J., Richland, October, 1920. Action by S. B. McMaster against Ford Motor Co. and others. Judgment for plaintiff and the Ford Motor Co. and Universal Auto Co. appeal. cite: Act which if'done by one would not be actionable, will not be made actionable if done by several by agreement: 24 How., 407; 37 E. R. A., 455; 58 E. R. A., 135; 91 N. Y. S., 185. E'ffect of malice or bad motive: 62 L. R. A., 673; A. C. (1898), 1; A. C. (1892), 25; Cooley, Torts (2d. Ed.), 832, 836. As to action taken in furtherance of trade: 21 R R. A. (N. S.), 550; 6 A. R R., 909. Evidence of former…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action against Ford Motor Company, a Michigan corporation, engaged in manufacturing and selling Ford cars throughout the United States through agents who are granted exclusive rights in certain territories, and against four of these agents, for $500,000.00 damages. The complaint contains two alleged causes of action, but, in view of the fact that the verdict was based upon the first cause of action alone, the second cause of action need not be considered.

The first cause of action alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff invented…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biggs v. HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Passaic Print Works v. Ely & Walker Dry-Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. McCrady v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  4. McMaster v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  5. Sullivan v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Bliss v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Johnson v. CurentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Bessinger v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API