Legal Opinion

Powell v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1975No. 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1229ORDER *

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

Petitioner Darion Powell owns an Anchorage cocktail lounge known as The Embers. The Embers, and several other local bistrqs, have in recent times gained a measure of notoriety by providing for their customers’ viewing pleasure “topless and bottomless” dancers. Section 4-3 (g) and (r) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Anchorage prohibits a person from either appearing or authorizing another person to appear “in a licensed premises in. which intoxicating liquor is offered for sale or consumed” while so “costumed or dressed so that the genitalia or pubic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Perry v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. A. J. Industries, Inc. v. Alaska Public Service CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Betz v. Chena Hot Springs GroupAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Department of Health & Social Services v. Alaska State Hospital & Nursing Home Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Childs v. ChildsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. DEPT. OF HEALTH v. State Hosp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rosalind M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's Services and Ingrid A. (Mother) and Togiak Traditional CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API