Clark v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The trial court submitted this case to the jury on two theories of negligence: (1) lack of supervision, and (2) lack of adequate instruction. Although the court was correct in its final conclusion that the case should not have been submitted to the jury on the first ground, it erred in dismissing the complaint, since there was evidence to support the verdict *490on the second ground (see Gardner v. State of New York, 281 N. Y. 212). Accordingly, the judgment may not stand. Inasmuch as we cannot know on which ground the jury arrived at its verdict, there must be a new trial (Phillipson v. Ninno,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Elenkrieg v. . SiebrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Phillipson v. . NinnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Gardner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by17 opinions
- Yeargans v. YeargansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Fein v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Allison v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Darrow v. West Genesee Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Singer v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.