Fein v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In submitting the case to the jury, the trial court charged that it might return a verdict in favor of plaintiffs if it found that defendant failed either (1) to furnish adequate supervision, or (2) to provide a mat underneath the chinning bar. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff; the court set it aside and dismissed the complaint and the Appellate Division affirmed that disposition.
Although the court was correct in its final decision that the case should not have been submitted to the jury on the first ground, it erred in dismissing the complaint since there was evidence to support the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clark v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Phillipson v. . NinnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by15 opinions
- Yeargans v. YeargansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Quigley v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Moschella v. Archdiocese of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Toomey v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Carhart v. Relmar Operating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.