Gardner v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Appellate Division found that failure to instruct the infant claimant pursuant to the customary method was the proximate cause of her injuries. We think this finding is in accord with the weight of the evidence. The question whether the head stand exercise was inherently dangerous to young children, even when properly instructed, is not presented by the record.
In each action the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Segerman v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Clark v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Darrow v. West Genesee Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Domino v. MercurioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Tabone v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.