Legal Opinion

Watland v. Lingle

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2004No. 25487PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

This original proceeding concerns the interpretation of article XVII, sections 2 and 3 of the Hawaii Constitution, which set forth specific procedures governing the amendment and ratification of proposed constitutional amendments. The plaintiffs, forty-six residents and registered voters in the State of Hawaii, challenge the validity of a constitutional amendment authorizing the initiation of felony prosecutions by written information [hereinafter, the amendment], which was presented to and approved by a majority of voters in the November 5, 2002 general…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Moore v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Bronster v. YoshinaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kaho'ohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nevadans for Nevada v. BeersNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Taomae v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kelly v. 1250 Oceanside PartnersHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kahoohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API