Legal Opinion
DONALD ROTUNDA v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 2, 2015No. 14-CV-618PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Senior Judge:
Appellant Donald Rotunda brought this suit for damages under D.C.Code § 28-3905(k)(l) (2012 Repl), part of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA), on behalf of himself and the “general public.” In the complaint Rotunda expressly disclaimed any intention to seek class certification under Superior Court Rule of Civil Procedure 23. The trial court dismissed the representative portion of the suit for that reason. 1 We affirm, because we find no explicit statement of an intention by the Council of the District of Columbia to supplant with ad hoc…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dane v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Hormel Foods CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Yehuda Steiner v. American Friends of Lubavitch (Chaabad)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Tolson v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Alston v. Whole Foods Market GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.