Legal Opinion

Bosecker v. Westfield Insurance

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1998No. 82A04-9711-CV-500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*771OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs-Appéllants William L. Bosecker and Diane Bosecker (referred to-collectively below as “Bosecker”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Westfield Insurance Company (“Westfield”) and Sam T. Heston & Sons, Inc., d/b/a Heston Insurance Agency (“Heston”).

We affirm.

ISSUE

Bosecker raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as: whether the trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that Bosecker’s property loss was not covered by his builder’s risk policy with West-field.

FACTS AND…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tate v. Secura InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Erie Insurance v. American Painting Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Ira S. Bushey & Sons v. American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Sutton v. LittlepageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Patton v. Aetna InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bosecker v. Westfield InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re WilkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bosecker v. Westfield InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API