Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Nazor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1939No. 27303PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an action in quo warranto, instituted in this court on behalf of relator, W. F. Smith, for an order to oust respondent, J. H. Nazor, from the office of member of council of the city of Ironton, Ohio.

The agreed statement of facts dis'closes that the council of the city of Ironton, Ohio, is composed of seven members; that a vacancy occurred therein by the resignation of one of its members; that on May 26, 1938, at a regular meeting of the council, attended by the six remaining members, council proceeded to fill the vacancy by election; that six candidates, including relator and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Reed v. DeMaioribusOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Halak v. CebulaOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. RichardsonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. The State Ex Rel. Flanagan v. Lucas, SheriffOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Salim v. Ayed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Corrigan v. TudhopeOhio Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API