Simi Investment Co., Inc. v. Harris County, Tex.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion on Judgment
HUGHES, District Judge.
1. Introduction.
This case is another of the endless illustrations of the truth that government is an institution that prevents injustice other than that it commits itself. Ibn-Khaldun, 1 Mu-qaddimah 262 (Franz Rosenthal, trans., 1958) (1394).
A county is preventing a landowner’s access to an adjacent street, claiming that a park separates the land from the right of way. The landowner seeks a declaration that its land abuts the right of way. Because the county’s title precludes it from creating a park between the thoroughfare and the adjacent land and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. MillardTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Waco v. Texland CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simi Investment Company Inc v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Simi Investment Co v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001