Legal Opinion

Burchette v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 3, 2004No. S03G1195PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether a portion of this State’s pattern Allen charge is accurate and should continue to be used. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the portion of the charge in question is inaccurate and should no longer be given by trial courts. However, we also conclude that, considering the Allen charge as a whole, it was not impermissibly coercive. Accordingly, we affirm Burchette’s conviction.

Following the trial court’s charge, the jury began its deliberations of Burchette’s case at 11:45 a.m. At 2:45 p.m., the jury…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. RodriquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Romine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Legare v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Lowery v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Velazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Widner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API